No OCTOBER surprise? REALLY?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/02/report-wikileaks-cancels-highly-anticipated-tuesday-announcement-due-to-security-concerns.html

Well, goes that OCTOBER SURPRISE….”SURPRISE! NO STORY BECAUSE WE”RE SCARED!”

From the article “NBC’s Jesse Rodriguez reported that the Tuesday announcement — which was to come from the balcony of London’s Ecuadorian Embassy, where Assange has sought sanctuary for years – was canceled due to “security concerns”.”  So they couldn’t give the announcement from within?  Or email it to London and have someone there give it?    GeeeZ, I guess all announcements get made from balconies at which people can shoot, huh?  OH, wait, they’re rarely from balconies…oh, well, we’re to believe him.  (Laughing yet?)

I wonder who got to them. But I don’t wonder much$$$$

WHAT an ‘about face,’ huh?

Theories, anybody?

Z

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

36 Responses to No OCTOBER surprise? REALLY?

  1. Assange didn’t want to commit suicide with two shots to the back of his head.

    Like

  2. bocopro says:

    Could be he just doesn’t wanna be found in a heap one day a victim of suicide. Lotta that goin around in the trail of the Klintoon PanzerMaschine.

    Like

  3. bocopro says:

    Sorry, Ed. Your comment didn’t appear ’til I posted mine. Didn’t mean to sound like a plagiaristic echo.

    Like

  4. Great minds think alike.
    So do we 🙂

    Like

  5. geeez2014 says:

    Ed and Bocopro, so you think Assange hadn’t considered being killed weeks and weeks ago when he announced he had dirt on Hillary that could kill her campaign? Only now, two days before the announcement, he got scared?

    Like

  6. fredd says:

    Our ol’ pal Julian Assange will come through. He’s just building up the suspense.

    Like

  7. Silverfiddle says:

    All this wikileaks stuff is cloaked in kookery, which is unfortunate, because there is some real stuff in there. It’s strange they are going after Hillary so hard… On the surface, you’d think the shadowy lefties would be supporting her, but I think the wiki/Anonymous hackers are more libertarian-anarchist types who oppose her corporate-sponsored neocon globalism.

    We’ve been subjected to decades of Clinton scandals where we thought they were goners, only to watch them slip the cuffs and skip off laughing. The latest Justice Department/FBI corrupt-sham “investigation” on her just sealed the fact that the Clintons are bullet-proof. Not only did she get off, all her underlings escaped as well. Not one sacrificial peon thrown into the volcano… That is unprecedented in American politics.

    Forget it, folks. I’ve said it before: Hillary is an old battleship, hull pockmarked with the scars of a thousand battles and rusted at the waterline, stern sagging from the weight of decades of scandals, sails tattered, but somehow she stays afloat, probably by some satanic power…

    Like

  8. Silverfiddle says:

    I made my Hillary battleship comment at FreeThinke’s, and a wag who bills himself “Craptain Arab” made the following witty riposte:

    ARRR… Ye come up with a good one, Long John SilverFiddly!

    The SS Satanic

    The most horrific ship to sail the seas. We had the Titanic, but now we have the Hildabeest as the SS Satanic, sailing an infinite sea of eternal fire, Satan’s foul breath filling her tattered sails as she blasts away at all that is true, right and just.

    The SS Satanic drops anchor on far-flung exotic ports, disgorging that pirate Slick Willy to smooth talk the tribal chiefs as he rapes their young wimmin!

    Like

  9. geeez2014 says:

    fredd, I sure hope so. THOUGH, I hate to see our politics suddenly involve such really shady guys like him, so able to affect US and our choice of Commander in Chief.

    SF, I like your wit better but Craptain Arab’s isn’t bad.
    Yes, she is a “an old battle ship….staying afloat..” What troubles me the most is what we all know: We haven’t an honest media anymore in this country DUE TO LEFTISM. DUE TO LEFTWING JOURNALISM TEACHERS who forget the integrity we taught budding journalists since the onset of America…”Who What When Where and Why?” Not “AND HERE’s THE CORRECT LEFTWING TAKE ON IT”….
    THAT IS WHAT KEEPS HER AFLOAT….

    NOW, only now, do I REALLY understand how dictators and tyrants took over European countries…media in their pockets, people not knowing the truth. It’s here now, in my opinion.
    And, anything RIGHTWING is painted to our next generations as WRONG, STUPID, HATEFUL, OLD FASHIONED, etc etc…

    Are these journalists truly so ideological as to want to spew things so one-sidedly (We know better, we need to heal America to our thinking)? Or are they ideological and don’t even see how they spin, so blinded by what they’ve been taught in university?

    Like

  10. FB says:

    Maybe a setup to get more attention and increase the suspense. Hopefully that’s what it is.

    Like

  11. FB,
    Let’s hope for that!

    Like

  12. Mal says:

    I only hope Fredd is right, that Assange will come through ’cause we really can use the boost right about now.

    Like

  13. FB says:

    Saw on Fox News Youtube that it’s coming tomorrow. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nn7AFAq-ji8

    Like

  14. Imp says:

    Assange? Why would we need his revelations? Haven’t we seen enough everyday from lynch, Comey, her 5 co-conspirators given “immunity”, the goober sitting next to Gowdy and her evilness herself? Each day we have more and more ammo to put her being bars.

    Like

  15. Imp says:

    Like this…Gowdy says Gross Negligence is enough….

    Like

  16. FB says:

    We need Assange b/c he has a very strong impact with millenials and the new generation. He even has more credibility than most media.

    Like

  17. Kid says:

    Actually – Yet during the weekend WikiLeaks announced that due to “recent security concerns” at the Ecuadorean Embassy, Assange’s balcony appearance had been canceled. However, Assange will go ahead and deliver an address via video link at a Berlin press conference later on Tuesday.

    From RT.COM

    https://www.rt.com/news/361403-assange-balcony-security-concerns/

    Like

  18. geeez2014 says:

    Kid, that’s why I posted this, SO upset that the weekend news was SO rotten.
    And that’s what I asked in my post… did he HAVE to do it from a BALCONY?!!! WHy not email it elsewhere and have someone read it.

    FB, it was slated for tomorrow, then canceled…let’s see what REALLY happens.
    And let’s hope it’s BIG and (Please, God) PROVABLE, because NOTHING STICKS TO HILLARY!
    And, in my opinion, it’s so unhealthy for millennials to be so enamored with a rogue jerk like Assange….though I’m all FOR him if he can FINALLY bring up something against the shrew which is incontrovertible, which I frankly doubt.

    Imp’s so right; after ALL we know about her and her evil corruption for YEARS, why should it take ASSANGE to make a difference when really GOOD people have tried and TRIED???

    Like

  19. geeez2014 says:

    Sorry to those who left videos….I can’t open videos again today.

    Like

  20. Kid says:

    National Security is another matter, but if Assange wants to release information on out of of control criminal politions and others Im all for it. The distance between reality and some peoples brains in this country is measured in light years.

    Like

  21. FB says:

    We have media who don’t do their jobs. There’s no 4th estate anymore. So I’m all for Assange and hackers because ultimately we have crooks in power. If the crooks are on the right, Fox News will cover for them, too.

    Like

  22. geeez2014 says:

    FB, FOX has left a LOT of what we know out, you’re right…very curious stuff’s going on.

    Kid, I agree, I just wish our kids weren’t so gleeful about Americans getting caught; this isn’t about criminal politicians with THEM, as it is with us, this is all ‘hate America first’ crap from their instructors..”Oh. boy, Americans did wrong again…YIPPPEE What CRAP WE ARE, huh?”

    Like

  23. geeez2014 says:

    “a GENIUS lost this much in ONE YEAR?” Hillary says about Trump; VERY< VERY clever remark, Hillary.
    She's got SUCH good people coaching her lines….darn

    Like

  24. Everybody lost big in 09, also.
    I’m sure Soros did.
    But Trump made it back.
    There’s some genius to that.

    Like

  25. Imp says:

    @Z..did you see where the lying hypocrite also took a 688K loss on her income tax? Or where they put all their homes into some LLC or Trust whereby they didn’t have to pay Property taxes or very little? So…she doesn’t pay for those Pell grants, school lunches for kids or contribute to schools either. Furthermore…her 8 years in the Senate…she promised jobs for upstate NY…none…nada…zippo. If no one ever took risks…there wouldn’t be any innovations, jobs , industry or much of anything if every investor wanted to play..”safe”.

    Clintons have built NOTHING…ever. They’ve never had a job in the private sector either and have always lived in public housing. So how does one amass a net worth of $200 million mostly accumulated while she was sewn of state? She thinks we’re all…stupid…and deplorable. I’d rather get the clap that vote for this animal.

    Like

  26. Imp says:

    What does this tell you?

    5. According to the analytical FiveThirtyEight website, Hillary Clinton has greater than a 99.9% chance of winning where?

    The other four states – CT, NJ, OR, and VT – are also on the Clinton side of the ledger, but with nowhere near the assurance of DC.

    Cause they know they’ll hold onto their corrupt cushy power seats and parks? They couldn’t care less about the country or their “party”.

    Like

  27. Sparky says:

    Who says bribes and threats don’t still work …. *sigh*

    Like

  28. Imp says:

    Republicans are the enemy, Trump supporters are deplorable, Bernie supporters are basement dwellers, but Hillary’s slogan is stronger together?

    Like

  29. geeez2014 says:

    Ed, great point.

    Imp…so WHERE is the NEWS on that? Has FOX even mentioned it, or did you get that info at WND or Free Republic (untrustworthy)?

    Like

  30. Imp says:

    Never…never read WND.

    Like

  31. Imp says:

    Hillary has said that recently and repeatedly.

    Like

  32. Imp says:

    I just had a thought…has anyone ever said they saw hillary in a maternity ward or visited her when she gave “birth”? Or seen Chelsea’s Birth Certificate either? A nurse or the doctor who was there?

    Like

  33. Kid says:

    chelseas daddy was hubble.

    Like

  34. geeez2014 says:

    Kid, there is NO DOUBT IN MY MIND…she is the spitting image of Web Hubble. I know that’s gossipy, and silly freerepublic stuff, but this time I think that’s absolutely the truth.

    Imp, doesn’t matter about the BIRTH, the CERTIFICATE…nothing. On record, at the hospital, everywhere, it’d be FATHER: BILL CLINTON. Doesn’t have to say anything else.
    Gee, I feel a little cheap even talking about this, but LOOK AT CHELSEA! PUULLEEEZE!

    (maybe that’s the OCTOBER SURPRISE!?) HA!!

    And what has Hillary said “repeatedly,” Imp??

    Like

  35. How hard could it be for a dedicated investigator to get DNA samples from all three?

    Like

  36. Mal says:

    Really, who cares who Chelsea’s father is, or what Trump said to a beauty queen back in the 1990’s? This kind of stuff detracts us from what is really important in this election. Get back to the basics in this election and pound it into the minds of the electorate and we might win.

    Like

Leave a comment