ANY PRAYER REQUESTS ARE WELCOME!
Please, READERS, keep any input on the posts ON TOPIC. Thanks!
ALSO: Please give $11 a month to the Stephen Siller Tunnel toTowers Foundation!,
It's so worthwhile!
https://tunnel2towers.org/The chief danger that confronts the coming century will be religion without the Holy Ghost,
Christianity without Christ, forgiveness without repentance, salvation without regeneration,
politics without God, heaven without hell.
William Booth“I should like to see any power of the world destroy this race, this small tribe of unimportant people, whose wars have all been fought and lost, whose structures have crumbled, literature is unread, music is unheard, and prayers are no more answered. Go ahead, destroy Armenia . See if you can do it. Send them into the desert without bread or water. Burn their homes and churches. Then see if they will not laugh, sing and pray again. For when two of them meet anywhere in the world, see if they will not create a New Armenia.”
― William SaroyanThe inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings. The inherent blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery. -- Winston Churchill
Ignorance is not an opinion, liberals
I believe in Christianity as I believe the sun has risen; not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. C. S. Lewis
if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14THERE WILL BE NO THREATS OF ANY KIND AT THIS BLOG, TO POLITICIANS OR OTHER COMMENTERS. thank you.
-
Recent Posts
Blogroll
- Always on Watch
- Armenian History Centennial blog
- blacksphere
- Bunkerville
- Chattering Teeth
- Diary of a Right-Wing Pussycat
- ELIZABETH
- Fix Bayonets
- Flash Report/California Politics
- FOLLOW THE PROOF
- fredd
- Mac 'n GeeeZ
- Mark Blog
- Mustang Koji-San
- Not of this World
- Old Geeez
- One America News
- SAM HUNTINGTON
- Silverfiddle
- Thoughts from Afar Mustang
- Truth for Life
- Will ReadySetQuestion
- Woodsterman
- WordPress Tutorial
Categories
Archives
Meta
Blog Authors
Tags
Copyright & Fair Use Statement I hereby assert that the purpose of this blog is educational/informative in matters of politics and faith. There is no commercial purpose to this blog. There is no revenue generated from any material posted here. I am not in competition with any news source, including any other on-line journal, and I have no interest in interfering with any person’s ability to earn an income as an author, journalist, photographer, or artist. This website contains some quotations and excerpts from copyrighted material. These uses fall well within the copyright doctrine of “Fair Use.” Section 107 of the United States Code, Title 17, specifies the conditions under which, “the fair use of a copyrighted work . . . for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching . . ., scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.” It provides four considerations for determining fair use: (1) The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes, (2) The nature of the copyrighted work, (3) The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and (4) The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work. The use on this website of other material involves “criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship or research” (a) The “purpose and character” of the website is not “commercial.” (b) The overwhelming majority of the material is the author’s own research and work. It is in no way a mere collection of others’ copyrighted works, nor is any material competitive with those sources. (2) The “nature of the copyrighted work” quoted is often “news” or “faith,” categories given lesser protection in fair use cases than works of fiction. (3) Most uses involve excerpts rather than entire works. Because the adverse financial impact on copyright owners is central to the purpose of copyright law, and the analysis of alleged violations, it’s relevant to note that, under factor (4), (a) no one in search of the quoted material would substitute this blog or book for the original source, (b) it is highly unlikely this website (or any material created from it) will ever have more than a de minimis impact on any of the copyright works’ potential market, and (c) to the extent it might do so, it would be far more likely be a positive, rather than a negative, impact (by drawing attention to the work, crediting it, and providing a source where it may be found). Finally, to the extent any copyright owner may wish, consideration will be given to all reasonable requests that copyright material be removed from this website. I will always endeavor to provide proper attribution to the source of another person’s work if I know it. If I do not know the source of incorporated work, I will state “source unknown.” I will happily credit any previously unknown source if their identity is made known to me in “blog comments.” -GeeeZ
Exactly so.
LikeLike
Do you know if the ‘information’ offered during the previous Administration compromised intelligence sharing agreements with a third party?
LikeLike
Ah, a scant minute of digging reveals more than the headline: “The Obama administration has offered to help Russia improve its targeting of terrorist groups in Syria if Moscow will stop bombing civilians and opposition fighters who have signed on to a cease-fire and use its influence to force Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to do the same,”
IOW, the previous Administration offered to share select information if Russia complied with the stated stipulations, which they declined. Not exactly the same as Trump actually divulging intelligence with seemingly nothing in exchange.
LikeLike
And you know what Trump did exactly?
LikeLike
Nope. Do you? But I’m not using media driven comparisons in pursuit of victimhood. If the Trump Administration were pursuing an agreement with Russia, it’s not something that they couldn’t have stated by now, and completely diffused the this issue.
LikeLike
https://pjmedia.com/andrewklavan/2017/05/17/breaking-sources-say-theyre-anonymous/
LikeLike
Small potatoes to whatever the Clintons were up to and have done. Throw in Obama and I don’t want to hear anymore about it.
LikeLike
CI, if you know anything, you should immediately tell the media because the only people who really know what was said were the five in the room. NO NEWS VENUE knows what was said.
By the way, nobody also knows what exactly Obama did……..if you believe the media on that one, I’m pleased for you because I’m losing my trust in the media…actually, I did a long time ago.
Looks to me like you’re fine with both headlines….without knowing?
That is the point of my post; WE DO NOT KNOW. Headlines these days say the wildest thing, only to find that, in the article anybody bothers to read, the same information’s not actually there…but the innuendos are wearing Americans down.
JMB, thanks…it is clever and true.
Bunkerville…sorry, you’ll be hearing more!
LikeLike
Looks to me like you’re fine with both headlines….without knowing?
We have an explanation of the first headline, which whether true or not, is plausible. The issue [for me] is summed up best by Slate’s Joshua Keating: “Revealing classified information to accomplish a foreign policy goal is Normal. Revealing highly classified intelligence casually in conversation for no particular reason, if that is in fact what Trump did, is Not Normal.”
All this Administration need do, is proffer an explanation similar to what the previous Administration did, if that is indeed what transpired. I certainly don’t trust the media, but why would I then trust the serial liar in the Oval Office?
LikeLike
We don’t know if it actually was “HIGHLY CLASSIFIED” but the media’s sure acting like it is… and if it was, I’m thinking it wouldn’t be quite as safe to proffer any explanation to anybody but those who are privy to learning “highly classified intelligence.”
“if that is in fact what Trump did” is the key there, isn’t it. To assume anything is “not normal.”
It could be exactly the same information shared, the same level of classification, and we have learned by now the headlines would read like those in the post; therein lies my problem with it.
I don’t know enough to decide whether Trump did wrong or not. Not many people do.
LikeLike
Exactly. Although “highly” classified is media subjectivity, but theres’ no downside to admitting exploring intelligence sharing. I find blanket rebuking of these allegations just as intellectually incurious as mindlessly braying for impeachment.
LikeLike
Because I can’t know what Trump said or did, I can’t rebuke anything that’s said, but I will not support a media bent on misinforming, mischaracterizing, probably lying in favor of the Left, constantly……..to our country’s detriment….which I will include asking humiliating questions in press conferences on this trip Trump has just embarked upon, in front of foreign powers. Which will happen because our media doesn’t know better. The Dixie Chicks of America Media; insult and humiliate, confirm doubts in public.
Not a good plan but it’ll happen.
LikeLike
Late to the party maybe, but Natl Security Cheif McMaster stated nothing was shared that would have any detrimental effect on our natl security, intelligence sources or methods.
LikeLike
…..but I will not support a media…..
OK…but what constitutes supporting the media?
Kid – I concur that our national security is not in jeopardy, but if the assertion that third party intelligence were compromised, that is a huge concern for the Intelligence Community. The public-at-large doesn’t really have an appreciation [which is understandable] for just how much actionable intelligence we receive from allied and partner nations.
LikeLike
https://www.yahoo.com/news/reports-trump-said-firing-nut-job-comey-took-pressure-off-russia-probe-white-house-official-now-person-interest-195040125.html
I know a lot of you will ask how anybody knows Trump called Comey a ‘nut job’ and said his firing took pressure off him…to the Russians. I just hope and pray this isn’t true because I don’t want a president who’d call people things like that to foreigners…..it’s hideous. And THEY DON’T DO THAT. I’d be very surprised to hear a Russian bigwig insult his fellow Russian government folks as nut jobs….
I don’t know what to say about this latest information….https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/russia-probe-reaches-current-white-house-official-people-familiar-with-the-case-say/2017/05/19/7685adba-3c99-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html?tid=a_breakingnews&utm_term=.fa927b6ba255
I tried to find mention of this stuff at a conservative-leaning paper like the Wash. Times, which I like, but Googling didn’t bring it up for me.
CI…by SUPPORTING the media, I mean reading it, believing it, quoting from it.
LikeLike
CI, the reason we take the position against Obama and in favor of Trump is the overwhelming bias by the MEDIA against him. Perhaps if they had been fair and unbiased like they are suppose to be, our comments wouldn’t be necessary. It serves as a counter-balance to them.
LikeLike
Mal, I think there’s some truth to what you say…it’s kind of knee-jerk because the media is SO bad.
I was laughing yesterday as Juan Williams tried desperately to compare conservative media’s treatment of Obama to what the media’s doing now to Trump. He actually believes that they’re equal!!!!
But I can’t really stand up much for Trump anymore..the media’s got us, let’s face it. EVERY SINGLE DARNED DAY there’s some information that’s out there….and the WH doesn’t address it well at all.
I have mixed feelings now because I never could STAND that snake Manafort and it looks like he’s a ‘person of interest’ in some Russia involvement…what KIND of involvement, we don’t know…but if ANYBODY was going to do anything like that it’d be this hideous man
LikeLike
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/19/paul-ryan-reacts-kevin-mccarthy-recording-238602
ANother guy I could never stand is Kevin McCarthy…even if he IS a California Republican…..poor Ryan really had to dig the R’s out of THIS one…and this is RECORDED.
So, who’s recording and leaking, folks? Who at an All Republican meeting would give/sell a tape of McCarthy saying he believes Putin was paying Trump and Rohrbacher?
Rohrbacher is a VERY good man so I don’t believe this one BIG (also from California)…I’m wondering if McCarthy’s just sour grapes for some reason to a fellow California Republican.
LikeLike
Mal – Fair enough, though I don’t necessarily see blog comments as a counterweight to the media……probably because I intentionally don’t let external noise filter my assessment of a given issue.
LikeLike
Z- Irrespective of McCartys flippant comments, the FBI did inform Rohrbacher of Russian attempts to use him. Unwittingly on his part of course.
LikeLike
CI, but we all have to admit it doesn’t mean Rohrbacher actually made those comments because the FBI informed him of attempts to use him. Of course, ‘use him’ would probably usually mean “I’ll pay for this…” But no way Rohrbacher would take it, he’s got a pretty conscientious reputation. Of course…I could be wrong.
MANAFORT, on the other hand? blech
I WISH TRUMP’S WHITE HOUSE WOULD CLEAN ITSELF UP AND QUICK…We have to remember he’s only there 4 months and he did NOT expect to win (as some of you know, a friend of a very close friend was in the suite that night sitting next to Ivanka and watching Trump who seemed dumbfounded, barely said a word all night, and got up to write his speech when the realization hit him)…I don’t have any ‘ins’…this was the wife of someone who works closely with Pence…
Trump needs to get on TOP of this and just saying IT’S NOT TRUE isn’t enough, in my opinion…
What he can do, I’m not sure, but if anybody can manage a clean-up it’s Gingrich….I hope the rumors are true that they’re replacing Priebus with Gingrich.
LikeLike
No, I think Rohrbachers clean……just that we had intel of Russian intentions to use him however they could.
LikeLike
CI, then my opinion of McCarthy is proven…the very idea he’d “joke” about this is nuts, though many are saying Ryan said it was just joking and it had been said seriously
LikeLike
It’s like the majority of today’s SIT”COMS”…. black guys smart, suave, debonair, sophisticated, responsible daddies living in homes surrounded by white picket fences, potential BMW 760 or MB E class auto buyers. White guys…. pansy, poor, poozified, numbskulls all hanging off the back of garbage trucks for s living.
So remember…. Obama was the ultimate magic negro and Trump Is the opitime of all blue collar white middle class tradesmen yet total fools that are one paycheck from generational dependence on welfare and utter failures who need to have all their heroes of history sullied mocked spat upon their statues and tributes to them torn down….. in Oder to make history “right and just “.
Lets not stop there with the past… now they’re changing the present so that they might change our future. Are you afraid yet? You better be.
LikeLike
Sorry…. I guess I’m a day late? My days are usually moments I’d like to forget anyway.
LikeLike
Imp! Never apologize, you’re never ‘late’….your comment fits better on the last post but you are so right about changing the past to kill the present and future.
It’s horrifying…it’s worked in socialist countries….I guess it’ll work here now, too, thanks to liberals.
LikeLike
https://www.yahoo.com/news/colorado-governor-pardons-felon-stave-off-deportation-215225404.html
ARE YOU KIDDING ME? Now we’re …what?
LikeLike
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ivanka-trump-jared-kushner-break-154803512.html
I wonder just how freakin’ LOW the media can get…or maybe their breaking Shabbat isn’t as low as the article a few weeks ago about how Americans need to worry because Kushner’s now wearing his HAIR like Trump’s…as if ANYBODY could wear their hair like Trump’s
Scum media
LikeLike
Hey Hillary….. Isaiah 65:15 “Your name will be a curse word among my people…” When I hear it, I am offended, and realize the uncanny truth in prophesy.
LikeLike