OH, they found SOMETHING …. she’s quitting! The Muslims win again!
Katie Hopkins, the Gert Wilders of England, tweeted “… Do not be a part of the problem. We need a final solution #Machester [sic].””
OH MY GOSH!!!! HELL TO PAY!! what?…. Well, apparently, because the term ‘final solution’ was used against Jews by NAZIS, the term ‘final solution’ is not acceptable as part of the English language anymore.
Oh, if she’d only realized what she’d said and not tweeted in anger. She’s right, we DO need a solution that will be final in fighting ISIS.
But, they won. The Conservative is gone. Bill O’Reilly, AIles, Hopkins…Hannity was almost done in until we found his attacker says she lied………..
Is Trump next? If you heard the Beast’s speech at Wellesley, in front of graduates laughing about a Trump impeachment, unutterably disgusting and getting HUUUGE applause by the sycophants, you know HE IS NEXT. They will NOT STOP. No matter WHAT. NO MATTER WHAT.
This was emailed to me yesterday, it’s supposedly from the NY Post, if you can find it there, great, I couldn’t….but we know this is true and I urge you to read and comment:
If you had an army some 30,000 strong and a court system stacked over the decades with judges who would allow you to break the laws, how much damage could you do to a country? We are about to find out in America.
The ex-president said he was going to stay involved through community organizing and speak out on the issues, and that appears to be one post-administration promise he intends to keep. He has moved many of his administration’s top dogs over to an organization called Organizing for Action (OFA). OFA is behind the strategic and tactical implementation of the resistance we are seeing across America, and politically active courts are providing the leverage for this revolution
OFA is dedicated to organizing communities for “progressive” change. Issues are gun control, socialist healthcare, abortion, sexual equality, climate change, and of course, immigration reform.
OFA members were propped up by the ex-president’s message from the shadows:
“Organizing is the building block of everything great we’ve accomplished. Organizers around the country are fighting for change in their communities-and OFA is one of the groups on the front lines…Commit to this work in 2016 and beyond.”
OFA’s website says it obtained its “digital” assets from the ex-president’s re-election effort and that he inspired the movement. In short, it’s the shadow government organization aimed at resisting and tearing down the Constitutional Republic. AMERICA
Paul Sperry, writing for the New York Post, says OFA will fight President Donald Trump at every turn of his presidency and the ex-president “will command them from a bunker less than two miles from the White House.” Sperry writes that the ex-president is setting up a shadow government to sabotage the incoming administration through a network of non-profits led by OFA, which is growing its war chest (more than $40 million) and has some 250 offices nationwide. OFA IRS filings, according to Sperry, indicate OFA has 32,525 volunteers nationwide. The ex-president and his wife will oversee the operation from their home/ office near the White House.
Think about how this works, for example: Trump issues an immigration executive order; OFA signals for protests and statements from pro-immigrant groups; ACLU lawyers file lawsuits in jurisdictions where activist judges obstruct the laws; volunteers are called to protest at airports and Congressional town hall meetings; the leftist media springs to action; the twitter sphere lights up with social media; violence follows- all emanating from the ex-president’s signal that he is heartened by the protests.
If Barack Obama did not do enough to destroy this country in the 8 years he was in office, it appears his future plans are to destroy the foundation on which this country has operated on for the last 241 years.
Z: I don’t know if it’s a “Shadow government” and it’s terms like that which give the media a fine thing to laugh about, but……….can anybody disagree with the sentiment?
How many things have happened where we suddenly see the onion unfold?…Trump or his folks say something, try something, and ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE……..judges, media, etc…all INTO ACTION!
God help America.
geeez2014
GeeeZ .... 
A whole buncha years ago I wrote a piece titled Quis custodiet ipsos custodies?
Posted it in comments on a blog, then it got linked and excerpted in some others. Happened across it recently while digging around in the vergessen wing of my filing system. Saw that by changing a name or two or a “scandal” here and there, it applies as well today as it did a dozen years or so ago.
Prominent Democrats are strutting around these days decrying the “culture of corruption” and the “degeneracy,” “decadence,” and “debauchery” rife in Republicaniana over the latest sex scandal to come out of Congress – the Mark Foley resignation over inappropriate sexual contact with male pages. MSNBC headlined one of its stories on the topic with “How Low Can the Republicans Go?” Outrage and disgust ripple through the autumn air like the smell of long-forgotten tomatoes and overripe pumpkins as the seasoning in the bubbling brew of calls for Speaker Hastert to resign for failing to take Foley out to the woodshed and cane him severely.
But . . . similarly to their complete lack of strategy for handling major current issues any differently from how Bush is doing, Democrats really don’t have a defensible track record on sexual miscreancy and down-home hedonism. They stagger around, looking for cameras and microphones into which they loudly and indignantly attempt to issue meaningful statements but never quite get past “GET BUSH!”
[here followed a 2-page inventory of sexual malversation and deviancy culminating with Slick’s]
So Nancy Pelosi carries in her pre-fab speech as if it’s the Great Seal and rants about “culture of corruption” because it’s a few weeks from mid-terms and she favors alliteration. She seems to forget that a culture is a bunch of bacteria growing in a dish, and that seems to sum up the Democrats’ raison d’etre. We certainly have to give them credit for being politically correct, tho, since they seem to have no prejudice concerning where they make their DNA deposits, either in gender OR age.
And, like most politicians, since she knows almost nothing about the subject, she discusses it at great length and with bubbling, vehement outrage. The pathetic exercise in hypocrisy is a classic hybrid of fact, fiction, and flowery fury. The record shows that when Republicans break laws or the codes of ethics and get caught at it, they resign. Agnew, Nixon, Lott, Foley . . . but when Democrats are caught en flagrante delicto, their buddies back them up and their constituents re-elect them.
LikeLike
Oh, and BTW . . . speaking of “solutions,” how ’bout this’n?
https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2017/05/25/fewer-tears-fewer-lies-and-more-righteous-anger-n2331247
LikeLike
Katie Hopkins tweeted in anger? Yes, indeed. Righteous anger, which is the proper response to the deliberate slaughter of tweens, teens, and their parents in that Manchester arena.
Her choice of the words final solution was politically incorrect. And she has already said that she didn’t mean those words in the sense of the Holocaust.
Might she not have been in trouble had she said definitive solution?
She probably would not have been in trouble had she said definitive answer.
Apparently the word solution is politically incorrect. Can we say solution in math questions? As in “What is the solution to this problem?”
LikeLike
Note THIS:
Donald Trump thanked Hopkins in December 2015 for her “powerful writing on the U.K.’s Muslim problems”, and described her as a “respected columnist”.[80][81]
Hopkins supported the then candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, Donald Trump, in the Daily Mail during December 2015: “I hear cries that he is a blithering idiot. I have often been called a deranged fool. But if this were true you could ignore me, ignore us, imaging [sic] the two of us shouting naked at the rain. It’s because we articulate sentiments repressed by the politically correct consensus that we have a voice”.[82] Hopkins defended his remarks that all Muslims should be banned from entering the United States. Trump thanked Hopkins for her support, calling her a “respected journalist”…
Is being supportive of Trump the real reason that the Find-and-Destroy Police have been dogging her? And is that the commonality among O’Reilly, Ailes, and Hannity? Kafka-esque.
LikeLike
Well – that’s too bad. She seems to have her head screwed on right. I notice the libtards are pretty quiet since Trump’s trip was so successful. The worse thing they could dredge up was Melania flicking Trump’s hand away when he tried to grab it. I thought the whole thing was hysterical and watched it over and over. Melania knew it was not an appropriate time to be holding hands and let Donald know. Not to mention she was walking behind him in 4″ heels and he could have pulled her over. It was a subtle and graceful flick – one every wife has done at one time or another.
LikeLike
Pingback: The Weekly Headlines – My Daily Musing
Adrienne….libtards quiet? Then you haven’t seen CNN lately. One of the guys on the trip actually said that the president’s goodbye speech just before getting on Air Force One (it took off 15 minutes ago now) to our troops in Italy “….didn’t mention the fact that Western countries don’t like his stand on global climate change and were wary about other things he said.”
I guess what the President was SUPPOSED to do was do a speech on whatever CNN found lacking and remind all the troops there of ANYTHING that didn’t go very well!? Had me laughing! Then they went on to KUSHNER KUSHNER RUSSIA KUSHNER, etc….they’re LOVING this situation Kushner’s now in.
I watched that video about 5 times, too, and wrote here that’s exactly what my husband would have done…reached back to make sure I was there and fine, and I’d have given him the okay “go ahead, honey….you’re on!” Today at Sigonella they were holding hands and I noticed yesterday a very sweet smile she gave him when the camera was barely on her…..not for the public but between them.
AOW, Yes! When they talk of Hopkins in many of the pieces I’ve seen, I found it funny they introduce her as “Trump Supporter Katie Hopkins” (just to dig the knife into her a bit harder?)
SHE ROCKS…and I worry about her staying alive with what she says…
As I said above , are the words FINAL SOLUTION forever out of our lexicon like our Southern Generals statues are knocked down and hidden? bad things existed, we DO need a final solution to radical islamist jihadists. SHE WAS RIGHT! We need these murderers dead before good people are killed.
LikeLike
Bocopro, here is my fave paragraph from your link and one I believe Trump would agree with and backs “The only appropriate reaction is righteous fury that turns into a grim determination to exact a retribution upon the bomber’s bros so thorough and so comprehensive that in a thousand years the few descendants of the survivors will still terrify their children with the story of the vengeance exacted by the avengers of the West. ”
I would add FEROCIOUS to ‘righteous fury’ !!!
And your words here ” The record shows that when Republicans break laws or the codes of ethics and get caught at it, they resign. Agnew, Nixon, Lott, Foley . . . but when Democrats are caught en flagrante delicto, their buddies back them up and their constituents re-elect them.” ARE SO TRUE…thanks
LikeLike
“Her choice of the words final solution was politically incorrect. And she has already said that she didn’t mean those words in the sense of the Holocaust.
Might she not have been in trouble had she said definitive solution?
She probably would not have been in trouble had she said definitive answer.”
It’s all nonsense AOW….we have a definite answer and it is a FINAL SOLUTION
NO MORE JABBER AS KIDS DIE. No more stupid candles and flowers…they’re not a solution…they’re to ease guilt and lack of a solution. Instead of flowers they need bombs and a country wide purge. No matter what we say about internment…it worked….we had no Japanese attacks on the homeland did we.
LikeLike
So they aren’t for the total destruction of ISIS ? Guesss that’s the conclusion.
Someone has a problem wiht what you say in these circumstances tell them to shut the hell up.
LikeLike
…..we had no Japanese attacks on the homeland did we
That presumes any of the weren’t patriots Americans…and would have engaged in acts of sabotage. Why didn’t we do likewise with the Germans? Religious faith is much more difficult to prove, sans admitting to such. So good luck with internment.
Oh, but if we had such fervor to stop the thousands of things that kill far more of us than terrorists…..
LikeLike
Imp! “NO MORE JABBER AS KIDS DIE.: AMEN to that….you nailed it.
CI, is internment mentioned above? I glanced and don’t see it.
The Germans were treated horribly in their neighborhoods, BELIEVE ME. I know this from Germans who were young kids during WW2, whose families had lived here their whole lives. But, of course, they were NOT interred.
And, there were Japanese American kids who signed UP to fight in WW2!~! Sure, some might have done sabotage but they were mostly as patriotic as the next immigrant family was.
Imagine their dismay when all of that hit?
There are a LOT of Japanese families who live in an area very near me….A friend who’s dead now told me he’d gone to High School there with them and after the war they thanked him for always having been so kind to them, that many were not.
And, of course, the interment camps. sad. BUT, they also produced some happy marriages I know about 🙂
Kid; I AGREE!!
FINAL SOLUTION…..I think we ALL Know that the left despises Katie Hopkins and couldn’t WAIT to pounce and , voiila!…she said something they could nail and she’s OUT….OUT OUT OUT. Thankfully, she’ll turn up elsewhere and continue to write, I’m sure.
We need more like her…….to remind us that candles and hugs after the fact don’t prevent the bloody destruction of children in the West.
LikeLike
CI….you say ‘religious faith’….Even many Japanese were Christians…most Germans are/were….and there are Muslim Christians, Coptic Arabs, etc…….
I thought this was hopeful: “Introducing Trump, Saudi Arabia’s King Salman spoke of the need “to stand united to fight the forces of evil and extremism.” (Z: you can’t misinterpret that)
“There is no honor in committing murder,” Salman said, adding that Islam is “the religion of peace and tolerance.”” Well…….let’s hope. So far, notsogood.
How about this? THIS IS GUTSY! “Trump Tells Muslim Nations to ‘Drive Out’ the Terrorists in Saudi Arabia “Drive. Them. Out. Drive them out of your places of worship,” the president continued. “Drive them out of your communities. Drive them out of your holy land, and drive them out of his Earth!”
LikeLike
Z Exactly right. My point was, that religious faith is not something somebody else can prove. Attempts to round up and intern law-anding American Muslims [aside from being un-Constituional, un-Conservative and irrational] would be logistically impossible, unless they admitted their faith and turned themselves in.
LikeLike
CI…but many people believe ALL Muslims are bad and threatening. I personally don’t.
I will never truly accept the fact that what’s been missing are blanket denouncings of radical jihadists BY Muslims. No marches of protest, VERY few speaking out. A few do, on TV and otherwise, but VERY VERY few. A drop in the bucket.
The Saudi King said more than any Imam has here ever….when he said what I wrote above…”“There is no honor in committing murder,” We all know that even the Hadith tells Muslims to lie if it promotes Allah, but I don’t believe this was a lie, I believe he was speaking his truth and THAT is MUCH MUCH bigger than most people think…and sadly not discussed at all in the news.
LikeLike
We could deny islam religious status bydeclaring it a cult and close the mosques.
95% of Pakistani’s believe violence against infidels is warranted or proper.
LikeLike
While Iman’s across the country and in other nations do preach against terrorism in their Mosques……It is difficult to square the public pronouncement of Salman bin Abdulaziz, with the institutional funding and export of Wahabbist ideology across the globe.
LikeLike
Kid – That’s easy to say…..I’d like to see a logistically and legally feasible plan to do so…..
LikeLike
It will never happen which is why we are screwed. Oir Freedoms will be used against us by a predator culture that has nothing in common with our own.
LikeLike
I agree with your second sentence [though by no means ensures them any success].
LikeLike
I agree with everyone here…I hate islamists as much as everyone does here, but I know not all muslims feel that way. It’s nearly impossible to square what the King said with what his sect does, making it that MUCH MORE IMPORTANT that the media had picked up on it and TALKED A LOT ABOUT IT. He might be thrilled they haven’t…He might have made sure they do not.
We can’t know.
SO, Kid’s verdict is the one that will keep us safe….NOT A RELIGION, KICK THEM ALL OUT.
But, it’ll never happen so I try to avoid that sentiment and come up with things that COULD work…….not easy to do!
One thing I hold fast to; When kids get killed in Manchester, I don’t approve of those many who say “If we hadn’t bombed Syria, or if we weren’t in Iraq… this wouldn’t have happened”….
I say “If these ‘people’ had a grain of goodness and Godliness in them, they could NEVER hurt innocent people any more than our soldiers enjoy it”.
LikeLike
The terrorism against the Infidel kicked into gear about 1970.
LikeLike
Even if we did declare Islam as a cult and not a religion, it wouldn’t change their behavior. In fact it would probably motivate them to kill more infidels.
LikeLike
Kid, it kicked into gear during the Crusades, then the genocides of the early 20th century! But ya….they started on US probably about that time……….Do you remember the first hit?
Mal, but that’s the rub. We can’t let threatening thereby causing more deaths to us stop our threatening them, right? They’ve got US by the short hairs.
IF THE MEDIA OR SOMEONE HAD REALLY TALKED UP THE SAUDI KID’S COMMENT I POSTED IN MY COMMENT ABOVE, IMAGINE WHAT MUSLIMS WOULD THINK? SURE, SOME HATE HIM, HE DOESN’T REPRESENT ALL MUSLIMS,B UT……….
by the way…apparently, there’s info that there was an Imam in Manchester who called the cops on this jerk who killed the kids and their parents………and the cops did nothing.
WE MUST REMEMBER SOME IMAMS ARE ACTING RIGHTEOUSLY.
LikeLike
Mal, But it would take away their special status in the US, such as Tax Free and whatever else they get. We would start taxing the mosques property tax for example. I’d say that’d be a pretty dran good bill to by by itself. Like the wall it would motvate fewer of them to want to come here for all the goodies.
It would also open a honest debate about who these people are and that islam has nothing in common with a free civilized society and they’d lose lots of liberal followers. Life here wouldn’t be much fun for them. And the tried and true, never give in to a bully it only emboldens them.
Geert Wilders of the Netherlands but he did have a lot of support for his platform of close the mosques and ship them out.
Poland and Hungary adn Slovakia won’t let them in and have told the EU in regard to their migrant quote demands – up yours. Keep your EU too if you don’t like it.
Sounds like a good time to strike to me.
LikeLike
Geert lost the election but…..
LikeLike
Z, A bona fide list of terrorist attacks against non-muslms starts around 1970. quadffi planting a bomb on the Pan Am flight was a big one that comes readily to mind. The Munich? Olympics. It’s been escalated tremendously and No One is doing anything the least bit substantial. Honestly when you ahve a guy walking around in a nightclub for Hours killing people. Yea the cops will help us. Or SWAT guys in body armor hiding behind trees as that little Korean vermin went around shooting people at Virginia Tech. It’s simply unacceptable. And the responses to the attacks make me want to hurl.
LikeLike
All justified reasons to carry and be prepared.
LikeLike
One of many reasons CI. Way too many.
LikeLike
Interesting move by the Administration…..
U.S. Quietly Lifts Limit on Number of Refugees Allowed In, May 26, 2017
LikeLike
“That presumes any of the weren’t patriots Americans…and would have engaged in acts of sabotage. Why didn’t we do likewise with the Germans?”
You…it sure does make a presumption. Yet it’s answerable by the fact that as far as we know, or the public was allowed to know at the time….we had zero attacks on the homeland from interned Japanese. As far as the case for interning Muslims who have declared war on the USA, we have sufficient grounds, reason and justification to do so… and proof of their intent exists all around us. Unless one chooses to ignore Orlando, 911, San Bernardino, Memphis, Garland, Texas, Fort Hood and on and on. We have a case for interning them if the next attack happens too. It was unconstitutional in 1940 too but we didn’t have as many traitorous quislings on huggy bear diets then as we do now. Brain dead snowflakes that couldn’t find their own state on a map with the other 49 omitted to make it fair. But given the mood of the country then and now ( we had our Pearl Harbor on 911 which was enough justification then, so why not now? ) I’d think we’d have wide spread support for such a move.
You ask why not Germans? Every one of their bundts were closed down and their leaders arrested. And spies when captured, executed. But the more obvious reasons may be because they are much harder to identify. They looked like 99% of America. Japanese were a race completely unlike our own. And profiling of anyone coming from 7 or more mooslem countries. 99% of them don’t like us and they make it clear they don’t want to assimilate other. Nor do they bother to look like us. They’re not blonde blued eyed Norwegians or Swedes remember.
LikeLike
“You….meant Yup or Yes..
LikeLike
…….we had zero attacks on the homeland from interned Japanese.
I could be flip and remind you that this could be the case, because they were interned. But only Japanese-Americans from the western states were interned. If they were a threat, writ large, acts of sabotage would have occurred from those who weren’t interned.
…..interning Muslims who have declared war on the USA….
Jaapan and Germany were nation-states, providing at least the flimsiest of grounds for these sorts of actions. You’re trying to assign such an intent on an entire population, based on a belief system.
At least you admit that such moves are un-Constittional. I just find it sad that you don’t seem to care about that guiding document……at least in light of actions that cause statistical anomalies of death or injury. You’d have a better case in interning smokers or drunk drivers.
LikeLike
Kid and Z, exactly right. Recognizing Islam as a “religion” continues their perks. They’re laughing at us as they continue to kill us\.
LikeLike