Sunday Faith Blog

Terror has struck in the West again….as you all know.   I know I speak for all of us when we say our hearts and prayers are with everyone involved, particularly the poor families who’ve been shocked to have lost loved ones.

How many of these must happen before government leaders finally realize there’s a theme; There are extremely few Norwegian terrorists,  let’s face it.

SO, I ask for PRAYERS for the families and for the WEST:

Please, Western leaders, we ask that you wake up, we ask that Mr. Trump’s travel ban does go into effect in our country and others, and that the EU stops their silly “No passports between EU countries necessary,” something that few mention but has made a considerable problem even worse for Western countries.   We ask that you stop your stupid political correctness toward muslims and ask yourselves why muslims aren’t speaking out and protesting the evil within them, we ask that those muslims who do not condone violence to anyone start speaking out, big time.   

We were all raised in a world where we felt safe in our homes, we recognized true evil when we saw it and took action, we felt our leaders were on our side and would protect us against such clear threats.  We didn’t know the term “politically correct” and we pray that term fades away in the future because it simply won’t apply.   We pray for our children, some of whom will never feel completely safe or trusting.

Amen.

“For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind.”  2Timothy 1:7

God, please bring back a spirit of power and love and of sound mind, particularly in our leaders, who have our lives in their hands.

I pray for the travel ban to be acceptable to the law and sanctioned by the Supreme Court of the United States of America.

Z

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Sunday Faith Blog, terrorism. Bookmark the permalink.

49 Responses to Sunday Faith Blog

  1. bocopro says:

    My daily rant:

    Modern terrorism as we know it began in what is falsely called Palestine. A group of people calling themselves Palestinians, but really nothing more than Arabs from Egypt and other nearby countries, invented it, perfected it, and exported it in their tantrum against the establishment of a Jewish state in a region from which Hebrews had been evicted many times over millennia.

    Some time back I researched the history of Palestine. If I remember correctly, in the area now known as Israel, fewer than a million Muslim Arabs lived there before WWII. Except for Jerusalem, the region was basically a thinly populated wasteland.

    Whether the establishment of a Jewish state in the center of several Muslim nations was a good idea or not isn’t the point. It wasn’t; but it’s a fait accompli which the world must deal with. Tens of millions of Muslims strongly disapproved of large numbers of European Jews subsidized by American money being plopped down in their midst. Hence the outrage.

    Now, until that tantrum, that lunacy, that hatred is eliminated, terrorism will continue to exist and prosper in the Middle East. And until acts of mayhem and murder by terrorists are no longer sensationalized by the western media, the global popularity of jihad against the Great Satan and his minions will remain high.

    Terrorism is the AIDS, the cancer, the plague of politics. It is dismal, viral, brutal, lethal, and global. It cannot be analyzed in any light other than national and cultural survival. It has no relationship with anything other than a corrupt perspective of an outdated cult whose goal is not a better world for everyone but an insect-like hive of mindless drones for the entire planet, their butts in the air, howling at their moon god.

    There is no such thing as neutrality where terrorism is concerned. Those who ignore terrorism and especially those who support or enable it, whether through belief or ignorance, are terrorists by default. Most Muslims are not interested in cutting off the heads of infidels, raping young girls, stoning women for refusing to wear shrouds, but they are very slow to condemn the radical Muslims who do it for them and in their name.

    We in the West are vulnerable to a wide variety of attacks, not just bombings. It’s only a matter of time until terrorists develop chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons which can decimate large populations and destroy entire cities.

    There is no negotiating with terrorists. Democracy is not a cure or even a viable weapon against terrorism. And for those who believe that responding to terror with force only spawns more terrorists, how has appeasing them worked out so far?

    Political correctness and understanding are just gasoline on the fire, since the only thing radicals understand and fear is strength. They take negotiation and “understanding” as weakness and an invitation to conquest.

    Limiting or suspending our civil and human rights to protect ourselves against suicidal lunatics who should never have been allowed in the country in the first place simply means that the terrorists have won. Don’t believe that? Just take a moment and check with Britain or Germany.

    Only eradication of the source will work, and mosques are unquestionably the incubators of radicalism. Since the “moderate” Muslims obviously have no interest in reforming Islam to disempower the radicals, the entire contaminated system must be eliminated.

    Islam is totally incompatible with American tradition, American values, American law, and American freedom. The name itself means “submission.” Muslims will never assimilate into the American culture, and they will forever consider Christians unclean infidels, no matter what they might say in public on the issue. Taqiya allows them to lie, cheat, or even deny their own faith to avoid persecution and ultimately overcome the infidel.

    Islam is a cancer which can either remain benign while growing in size or metastasize rapidly to overwhelm the body’s ability to resist and recuperate. It MUST be excised, quickly and completely, if the United States is to survive as a nation with continued technological growth and individual freedom.

    Islam = stagnation . . . and submission . . . and death.

    Like

  2. I too, hope that the travel ban can be enacted…..but unfortunately, it’s not enough. A decent first step, but we need to do much more with regards to immigration and entry visas. Sadly, the events we see in places such as London, will only serve to empower the sheep among us, to usher in a police state, and symbolically defecate on the Constitution. Then, some years in the future, when civil liberties are but a quaint memory…those same sheep will wonder how we got here.

    Like

  3. John M. Berger says:

    @bocopro,
    Your “rant”, as you call it, pretty well states the reality of the situation, as I see it; BRAVO ZULU! To state that we need no further expansion of this Islamic scourge in the United States or, for that matter, in the Western World would amount to nothing but redundancy. I can add nothing more at this time.

    Like

  4. geeez2014 says:

    Bocopro..thanks..Well said…I wish I could argue with you, we’d be a lot safer if we knew you were exaggerating; but you’re not, mostly.
    I suppose we all fear bio or chemical attacks the most, but we don’t hear much about them….it’s coming. God forbid.

    CI, “not enough”..what do you propose? You do know that it isn’t enough but there are more people who feel it is far too much, unkind, xenophobic, etc. They’ve won when Americans are more inclined to be kind to the enemy than to our own people, which is exactly what’s happening and they won’t recognize it till it’s too late.
    If we can finally enact this ban and take other steps, we hopefully can avoid anything like a police state.
    Tell us how you see curbing muslim radical terrorism.

    JMB: nothing much to add to that, you’re right.

    Like

  5. We have the Constitutional power to halt immigration. Full stop. That should be our ‘travel ban’, pending an overhaul of our entrance process and a complete gutting of “Thousands Standing Around [TSA], and reconstitution of a screening process based the Israeli model. Work to have Constitutional Carry pass in all 50 states and the territories, and add State grants to the Federal budget, to fund free firearm safety and defensive pistol marksmanship training to all adult, law abiding citizens who wish to carry.

    Above all, stop the goddamn fear mongering over a hazard that pales in comparison to nearly any other hazard that kills American citizens. Britain is a virtual police state with no civil liberties, and they can’t seem to stop these events. Ripping up our Constitution will not bring us safety.

    Like

  6. I pray for the travel ban to be acceptable to the law and sanctioned by the Supreme Court of the United States of America.

    By all means, we must pray along those lines.

    But from what I’m observing right now, I must predict that the travel ban will be shot down by every court — maybe even the SCOTUS.

    America as a whole is convinced that Muslims here “are different.” A comforting thought.

    But think about it for a moment.

    Across the Pond, the timeline of Islamic terrorism is ahead of ours.

    For one thing, the percentage of Muslims there is much higher.

    In the UK, we have seen these attacks on since 7/7/2005: the near beheading of Fusilier Lee Rigby in South London on May 22, 2013; vehicular jihad and at least one stabbing on Westminster Bridge March 22, 2017; the Manchester bombings on May 22, 2017; and the London Bridge/Borough Market jihad attacks on June 3, 2017.

    If these murderous Moslems are being radicalized via the Internet, we had better remember that America has the Internet, too.

    Furthermore, we have Wahhabist imams here, too — just as all of Eurabia has as well.

    I repeat: across the Pond, the timeline of Islamic terrorism is ahead of ours. By how much, nobody can say.

    Like

  7. Mal says:

    A travel ban now is closing the proverbial barn door after the horse left, but it still makes sense. What lies ahead is what was predicted at the onset of the worldwide Muslim relocation…..attack after attack after attack. Its too late. Our only hope is through strength and reeducation. Strength, to weaken and kill them (the only thing they understand) and reeducating them to counter their beliefs. I simply don’t see any other possibility.

    Like

  8. Kid says:

    Once again, we’ll never do what is needed, mostly because we can’t. Especially when you have half teh country sharing crocodile tears with upchuck shumer over the ‘poor moslems’ who want to come here and live off our tax money.
    So we’re screwed. I will be prepared to defend and will stay away from gun free zones where large groups of people are. That’s pretty easy for me actually, because I haven’t had any interest in those types of events for along time anyway. I haven’t even stepped into a mall in over 20 years.

    Like

  9. John M. Berger says:

    @ AOW,
    “Across the Pond, the timeline of Islamic terrorism is ahead of ours.”
    “For one thing, the percentage of Muslims there is much higher.”

    YES and [they] have allowed this to happen. Is there any reason, whatsoever, that [we] shouldn’t learn from this? While it won’t completely solve our problems, Trump’s temporary travel restrictions will, at least, show that we are aware of the threats posed by these vermin and are willing to take measures to quell such. If SCOTUS refuses to support this I’m afraid that we have failed to “learn” anything!

    Like

  10. Imp says:

    Bocopro..”strongly disapproved of large numbers of European Jews subsidized by American money being plopped down in their midst. Hence the outrage.”

    My understanding of that was it was the Brits again meddling in the Muddle East just as they had throughout their empire…and they are the ones who carved out Jordon, Israel and “Palestine”?

    “And for those who believe that responding to terror with force only spawns more terrorists….”

    Are these two not a contradiction ?

    “Only eradication of the source will work, and mosques are unquestionably the incubators of radicalism. Since the “moderate” Muslims obviously have no interest in reforming Islam to disempower the radicals, the entire contaminated system must be eliminated.”

    Yet I fully praise and want the exact same ting. I’ve been saying for 16 years since 911,we’re still being way too patient waiting for a Million Mooslem March on DC with American flags waving and them singing then national anthem. But…we know damn well if they did…they’d be only exercising their filthy Taqiya allowing them to lie in our faces. There’s no doubt in my mind that it has to come down to this if we’re serious about surviving and defeating those who really are ‘defecating’ on our constitution and want to eliminate it in it’s entirety and replace it with theirs.

    “Islam is a cancer which can either remain benign while growing in size or metastasize rapidly to overwhelm the body’s ability to resist and recuperate. It MUST be excised, quickly and completely, if the United States is to survive as a nation with continued technological growth and individual freedom.

    Islam = stagnation . . . and submission . . . and death.

    Like

  11. Baysider says:

    Z+1

    I agree with CI – it seems to empower the sheep. Read Bat Ye’or’s Eurabia, The Euro-Arab Axis. She writes in painstakingly researched detail on how Europe is being transformed into Eurabia, as Daniel Pipes puts it, something that “has blossomed from a minor discussion group into the engine for the continent’s Islamization.” We’re way beyond what cutting back immigration would do. This is deeply embedded into Europe’s political and academic structure.

    And bocopro +1. What brought so many ‘Palestinians’ into the formerly empty-ish region was the influx of Jewish settlers. I had a friend whose ancestors fled progroms in 19th century Russia to settle a farm in ‘Palestine’ — and they hired locals. Many Arabs immigrated there for work, and the ‘Palestinian’ population grew. By the late 20th century you could be counted as a ‘Palestinian’ if you had a little as 18 months in country! Most of these were from Yugoslavia and environs, coming for jobs in Israel.

    Like

  12. geeez2014 says:

    Ci “Britain is a virtual police state with no civil liberties” WHAT? I know that in France, cops can pull you over in your car, or check your guitar case on the Champs Elysee while you’re strumming away, without any provocation, but…Britain?

    And do you think we could ever stop all immigration with the political climate today? God forbid we tick SOME nationality or religion off. Or a liberal.

    Baysider..”We’re way beyond what cutting back immigration would do.” This is what we need to avoid…being beyond that time. But we will not.
    How many countries with immigration problems didn’t bring immigrants in for cheap labor then regret it? NOT MANY. Germany/Turkey…French/Algeria, etc..

    EVERYBODY: A travel ban MUST happen; if nothing else to show immigrants we DO CARE who comes here and that if you’re unsafe, you are NOT coming in.
    BUT, it needs to be country bans…not religious bans….and, while Trump’s (and Obama’s) was mostly COUNTRIES, the obvious point was IT IS MUSLIMS.

    AOW…we’re ripe NOW….and I’m not sure what’s prevented more attacks …but it won’t continue. Why would it?

    Like

  13. geeez2014 says:

    GET THIS, EVERYBODY: Brit’s Theresa May is saying “ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!”

    No, you haven’t had ‘enough’ yet, Ms. May….you’ve been lackadaisical and stupid in regard to your mosques, no-go zones (please nobody tell me there aren’t areas whites won’t go into because that’s a lie) and NOW you say “ENOUGH IS ENOUGH?” Tell that to the relatives of the 7 dead today and the many in critical condition in hospital

    Like

  14. bocopro says:

    Imp — ya kinda lost me there. Yes, it was residual British colonial arrogance that carved out not only Israel, but the purely arbitrary boundaries of Iraq, Syria, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia. (Much oversimplified, of course, but a 100-year history of the region would take pages.)

    In my humble opinion, the Balfour Declaration’s ambiguity and foreshadowing of the “white guilt” we’re experiencing in the US today is what led to the interminable, mortal, and some say inevitable conflict in the region. Nobody wanted the Jews, even back in 1917/8:

    “His Majesty’s Government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”

    Part of the problem is, of course, that no legitimate state known as “Palestine” existed, merely a region sorta unilaterally managed by Britain, known as the Mandate of Palestine. It was originally (prior to British involvement) part of Syria (Ottoman Empire stuff). Farther back in history it had been settled by Greeks, many from Crete, who were known as the Philistines.

    Philistines were from the very beginning crude, ignorant, uncivilized barbarians according to the Bible and most Western literature. The Torah (and especially Samuel) refers to them repeatedly as “pelishtim,” which becomes everything from “philistia” to “phyle histia” to “philistinus” in various Mediterranean languages and records.

    Naturally from the Arab (Muslim) side there are other interpretations, one of which is that they originated in Egypt and were the tribe which befriended Abraham. I’m gonna go with the barbarian version and the fact that Israel is a named state while Palestine is not in ancient texts.

    And that’s enuffa DAT.

    Like

  15. bocopro says:

    “GET THIS: Brit’s Theresa May is saying “ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!”
    No, you haven’t had ‘enough’ yet, Ms. May”

    And the Emir of London, Sadiq Khan, is more concerned about climate change than terrorism — surprise, surprise!!

    Like

  16. ….but…Britain?

    Yes, Britain. Try owning any sort of self defense weapon there. They’re deemed “offensive weapons”. Britain is a police state. Want something to keep you from sleeping at night? Google Britain’s Investigatory Powers Act.Then i aging how easy it would be to pass here, once the sheep start bleating.

    We have the Constitutional power to halt immigration. Even Trump apparently doesn’t have the fortitude to try that. Whining about a travel ban from a handful of countries is like pissing up a rope.

    Like

  17. Apologies for the typo….”Then Imagine…….”

    Like

  18. geeez2014 says:

    CI, I have to admit it was odd hearing the news last night with newsmen saying “arms-carrying police”….since the norm is NOT arms carrying…as if THAT’s smart? THESE DAYS?

    I don’t think all Americans who fear terrorism are sheep, I think they’re smart and worried that our government’s doing very little to stop the threats.

    We may HAVE the constitutional power but SO WHAT if they won’t? We need to deal with what we’ve got. And that isn’t good.
    So you think we should stop ALL travel for a while..Finland, etc…Of course, today, a man born in Finland could also be a radicalized terrorist, so I suppose that’s true; NO COUNTRY IS SAFE FROM ANY IMMIGRATION ANYMORE.

    BOCOPRO: at least this nasty mayor said there is NO EXCUSE for the violence last night….hopefully, that means radicalized islamists, too?!!
    http://www.barenakedislam.com/2017/06/04/president-trump-blasts-londons-muslim-mayor-after-latest-muslim-terrorist-attack/
    “Moderate Muslims are UNCLE TOMS” is what this mayor’s said.

    SOMETHING ELSE I WANT TO DISCUSS: Here is Trump’s tweet from last night…
    “At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack and Mayor of London says there is ‘no reason to be alarmed!’” Trump wrote.

    That bothered me somewhat because it was a little early to be making statements like this AND, as stupid as the mayor’s comment was in the wake of recent attacks IN LONDON, it bothered me that his assistant at one point tweeted that the mayor DIDN’T HAVE TIME to respond to Trump…
    He finally has and says Trump’s view of Islam is “ignorant” and could make for MORE problems…

    IF OUR LEFTWING MEDIA WASN’T QUITE AS WITHERINGLY INSULTING TO THIS PRESIDENT, I DON’T BELIEVE THE WORLD’S LEADERS WOULD BE QUITE AS EAGER OR WILLING TO BE THE SAME.

    This must stop. So must Trump; when attacks have just happened and there are dead and wounded, don’t use that as time to talk about travel bans……..it’s not polite and sounds heartless

    Like

  19. Do you think we should stop ALL travel for a while..Finland, etc…

    Yes. Per my recommendation for immigration and entry reform as stated above. The sheep, are those who will enable the passage of draconian legislation, to erode our civil liberties.

    Like

  20. Baysider,
    I read Bat Ye’or’s Eurabia long ago. Guess that I should review it now. I certainly have my own copy somewhere upstairs.

    Like

  21. Kid says:

    Imagine this. When I was in Britain a mere 26 years ago, people, Executives with the largest comapny in England MFI, where I worked as a project mgr for a distribution software project, were saying they believed that Amercica would be taken under Britian’s wing and ruled by Britain once again.

    Wonder what they think now.

    Like

  22. geeez2014 says:

    CI, I understand what you mean by your definition of ‘sheep’ and I don’t consider them sheep for wanting better safety. To ignore the radical islamic threat is being a sheep these days. What Draconian legislation do you see could happen?

    Kid, they were serious? For what possible reason did their going under Brit rule did they give? That’s NUTS

    Like

  23. Kid says:

    Z, They were serious. I dind’t press them much, didn’t want to offend. Since the concept was so absurd, asking how they saw that coming about would lead to a conversation I didn’t want to have.

    I won’t answer for CI, but let me put my two cents in. The Totality of American history with regards to problems of violence has resulted in the government restricting rights, which in turn only restricts the rights of law abiding people since the ohters don’t give a rats tail. Case in point S. Chicago probably has the most strict gun laws. I would challenge anyone to show me where restricting rights has created a more non-violent environment.

    Like

  24. Baysider says:

    BP: The name ‘Palestine’ is an ancient designation designed to erase memory of Jews from the land. After the Bar-Kokhba revolt in 132 AD, during which the Roman 12th legion was virtually wiped out, the Romans cleaned house. Hadrian had renamed Jerusalem Aelia Capitolina in anticipation of his plans to build a Roman colony there. Now Jews were barred from city, rubble bulldozed, villages razed, and the COUNTRY renamed Syria Palaestina after the Jews’ ancient stout enemy, the Philistines. (Hadrian combined it with Syria)

    Like

  25. geeez2014 says:

    Baysider; I’ve heard many say “there really IS no place that actually has the name PALESTINE..”
    the whole thing is an engineered mess, in my opinion…..
    An Arab guy owns Westwood Appliance.. he was here the other day talking about how WONDERFUL Palestine used to be. I nearly asked “Then what’s stopping them NOW? ….maybe it’s not a good idea to show cartoons to the Arab kids provoking them to kill Jews? Maybe that’s not working for you?”

    Kid, you know, we’re REALLY between a rock and a hard place because most of our politicians don’t want us safe enough to actually ban immigration (today in America, some writers are slamming Trump and asking “how would a travel ban prevented these attacks?” and they’re somewhat right….they were probably BORN HERE..BUT, many of them get training in Arab countries…and need to fly back, THAT has to be stopped somehow)….GOD FORBID THESE POLITICIANS TICK OFF MUSLIMS . …..but they’d better start SOON.

    So, can we SHUT DOWN ALL AIR TRAVEL? The Stupid EU allows anybody to cross borders without passports; lots of Americans don’t realize that but that hasn’t helped Europe ONE BIT…it’s only helped terrorists, basically.

    So you and CI see a country full of gun carriers….and I’m certainly not for non Constitutional legislation that would take our rights away… Sadly, our rights are protecting killers right now….The Left AND Right have to finally wake up to the threats and then what?

    WHAT CAN WE ACTUALLY DO? arming us all isn’t the answer.

    Like

  26. Kid says:

    What can we do? Evict all the moslems.

    That’s not gonna happen so option B is protect yourself. How are people gonna do that? Guns mainly. And even if it wasn’t for the moslem vermin, people still need guns to protect themself from the rest of the vermin who even kill more people. Perverts, rapists, killers, etc. Kick boxing lessons will get you nowhere. This is why the Constitution allows us to own and carry guns. You have vermin doing home invasions now when they don’t know if someone is armed or not, what do you think will happen if they think everyone is disarmed? Massive abuse of law abiding people.

    Like

  27. geeez2014 says:

    Kid, no it’s not going to happen.
    So guns are great, except if a big van crashes into an intersection killing 20 people right off the bat.

    I have heard that states with legal carry have lower crime rates…..

    We’ve got to figure out a way to protect pedestrians, highways, etc etc.
    Particularly when you’ve got total NUTS who can’t wait to die while they’re killing us…that’s a tremendous disadvantage for us. Kami Kazi muslims

    Like

  28. geeez2014 says:

    Germany’s been on my mind lately….it has at least as many muslims as England and I don’t remember a terror attack there…at least not like England’s. I worry they’re next and it’ll be BAD. Their cops don’t have guns, either…neither do people other than hunters, and that takes a heck of a deal to get a hunting license. Farmers have them, too.

    Like

  29. Kid says:

    Well, that’s my point you can’t protet yourself from them, even if they weren’t willing to die in the process. That people think there can be some other solution than kicking them all out ensures they will succeed. It’s that simple.

    Like

  30. Kid says:

    That people are totally willing to accept the idea that they cannot eject a group of individuals who are a cancerous entity to a civilized society is so foreign a concept to me, that I can barely talk about it. So there are 0.0001% of ‘muslims’ who are nice peaceful people.

    I don’t care. So they don’t want to go back to the ME. I DON’T CARE !! They hooked themself to the wrong wagon. Too bad !

    Like

  31. I understand what you mean by your definition of ‘sheep’ and I don’t consider them sheep for wanting better safety. To ignore the radical islamic threat is being a sheep these days.

    The fear is most often irrational. The statistics bear that out. One who who would sacrifice their liberty for security……deserves neither. Kid speaks truth…government is not the answer…a free society is.

    Like

  32. So there are 0.0001% of ‘muslims’ who are nice peaceful people.

    No statistic anywhere this side of GlennBeck’s chalkboard bears this out.

    Like

  33. Their cops don’t have guns, either…

    Au contraire…..I’ve also spent quite a few years in Germany….their Polizei are more often better armed than our municipal police.

    Like

  34. Kid says:

    CI, I would say 0 % of them are nice peaceful people, Z sais she met some so I was playig to that.
    You may thini the % is higher? Again I don’t care. They hitched their wagon to the wrong star.

    Like

  35. geeez2014 says:

    Ci and Kid, so you think less than that percentage of muslims are peaceful and nice?: WOW.

    CI….you’re right…I forgot; the people can’t bear arms, unless they have a farmer or hunting license, but the cops do. thanks for the reminder.

    EVERYONE: Did you know that some CNN host called RIZA ASLAN “criticized the president for his politicized response to he incident, also writing on social media: “This piece of s*** is not just an embarrassment to America and a stain on the presidency. He’s an embarrassment to humankind.”

    Can you take that IN? That anybody on television could be allowed to say something THAT BAD?

    I don’t believe that our freedom or liberty need this kind of horrible talk about a sitting president……..He needs to be fired. I’m all for free speech but not when kids are watching, not when the insults fly THAT BAD.

    Like

  36. I also don’t care….you’re smart enough to know that your statistic can’t remotely be correct. But then again, I don’t judge people based solely on what Abrahamic god they believe in.

    Also doesn’t hurt that a Muslim interpreter saved my life….as several others have saved the lives of American Soldiers.

    Like

  37. geeez2014 says:

    CI, there was also talk about an Imam warning about the Manchester bombings, that he’d called the police saying this guy was saying scary things…….nobody did anything, of course. (by the way, one problem is no country has the manpower to follow up on every lead, every rumor, I believe radicals are counting on this fact!)

    I agree with you….I don’t care WHAT god they believe in,…as long as they don’t want us DEAD.

    I’m glad the interpreter saved your life.
    Also, my heart especially bleeds when I hear Afghan police, for example, who’ve done the right thing, defending their people, having avoided become Taliban or ISIS themselves, and they get killed doing their duty.

    Like

  38. Kid says:

    CI, 95% of all stastic are made up on the spot.

    A black fellow saved my Dad’s life in WWII, but I still won’t go downtown after dark, and not comfortable in daylight either.

    Like

  39. Kid says:

    Z, When some vermin moslem can walk around for HOURS in an orlando nightclub shoorting people and putting it on facebook live and no law enforcement is willing to go in to try to save at least one individual, this tells you LAW ENFORECEMENT FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRIME OR YOUR DEATH IS 100% USELESS.

    Like

  40. Kid says:

    Once again the terrorists could never win. Hitler couldn’t win. Stalin couldn’t win, No armada can win against a determined people. Hitler couldn’t even win against England, that tiny island in comparrison.

    The terrorists are misdirection while the nice moslems breed you out, elect moslem politicians who eventually morph your culture to sharia law. How many things did obama do, totally against the Constitution, totally unchallenged. It could happen in a heartbeat one day. I won’t be alive to see it, but we, like the greatest generations of WWI, WWII, and the wars in the ME, who may really be the greatest generations fought to save the American way of live for yours and my grandchildren. The task is now upon US to do the same for our ancestors. And I believe we are screwing up in unimaginable ways.

    Like

  41. geeez2014 says:

    Kid, we’re totally screwing up. Agreed.

    Like

  42. Baysider says:

    Meanwhile, in Spain yesterday: http://gatesofvienna.net/2017/06/get-me-to-the-church-on-time-for-the-jihad/

    Paul Weston has an answer to Teresa May’s “we need to get serious” comment. It starts with naming the problem, and gets better from there. (Hint: he was once arrested for religious/racial harassment for reading in public a passage from Winston Churchill’s book The River War where he wrote unfavorably about Islam in the Sudan.) Do we hog tie the internet? Or the people who kill us?

    Like

  43. Baysider says:

    That passage from The River War (1899) concluded with: Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.

    Winston Churchill call your office!

    Like

  44. geeez2014 says:

    Baysider, that is THE perfect video for the post I’d written a couple of hours ago for tomorrow…thanks.
    The Spanish information, sadly, foretells horrible things, I’m afraid.

    Like

  45. Imp says:

    ” Farmers have them, too.”…O Mein Fuhrer had a farm eee I eee I oh….

    Which I have to ask…why do we have to always play the civilized ones and not terrorists too to fight terrorism? Think it’s about damn time the NRA organizes and supports open militias. One citizen murdered by ali bubba…10 jihadis at the local bomb factory mosque die and their mosque bulldozed. We really need to play hard ball.

    Like

  46. Imp says:

    “Hitler couldn’t even win against England, that tiny island in comparison.”

    Au contraire…he had them strangled and dangling off the cliff of Dover where they were all ready to dive off of. If they had gone it alone. If it had’t been for the fact that we transformed it into an aircraft carrier they would have fallen like France and most of Europe did. One or two more Bismarks or GrafSprees would have done in their navy for sure.

    Like

  47. Imp says:

    3 Dog Night has the answer?

    Like

  48. Kid says:

    Baysider, that video will be going out on all channels.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s