Would you rather this guy or the stupid, dangerous one?

(Add:  I am guessing this wasn’t read as sarcasm somehow….so I thought I’d better make sure it was understood! )

And now THERE ARE MORE THINGS TRUMP DID WRONG and we’re just now hearing about them.  

I’m sure glad that, in this great country, no other presidents or candidates for the presidency ever slept around or tried to prevent their competition from winning, or lied about anything. 

I’m positive that’s the case, aren’t you?

🙂 🙂
Z

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Would you rather this guy or the stupid, dangerous one?

  1. Mustang says:

    We don’t need a program to know how contemptible Democrats are or short-sighted, which is an ongoing problem in the House.

    Like

  2. “… shall be guilty of a misdemeanor”
    A misdemeanor.

    Wow! A newspaper suppressing stories harmful to a candidate!
    You know. Like the NYT and the Washington Post and CNN suppressed Hunters laptop.

    Horrible man!

    Like

  3. MAL says:

    Recently I read a statement by a judge that said there is nothing illegal in paying someone not to divulge something. A bit unsavory perhaps, but not illegal, so whats the big deal about Trumps “hush money”? 

    What really made me sick is watching Biden campaign, saying the border “will now be more secure than its ever, ever, ever, ever been” then walking off the stage, refusing to take any questions. And his believers buy that!

    Like

  4. geeez2014 says:

    MAL, I’m no lawyer but all I’m hearing (except on CNN, where it’s a cottage industry to slam Trump) is there is NO CRIME on the NY Case…. you’re right

    MUSTANG: Hoping to remind of the hypocrisy in the sleeping around of JFK and Clinton and Roosevelt, and so many others we may not know about…..but THIS GUY TRUMP MUST GO because of it!?

    ED….exactly! Oh, the hypocrisy….and VERY FEW are talking about it to where the public can WAKE UP.

    Like

  5. Baysider says:

    100%. At least not in the last 5 seconds.

    Hardly matters if there is or is not a crime. If it was or was not Russian interference. It’s the narrative that sticks.

    Mal, careful about pols talking out 2 sides of their mouth. The border MAY be secure – but for WHOM?

    Like

  6. geeez2014 says:

    BAY….”100%. At least not in the last 5 seconds.” Right!!

    and yes, “for WHOM?” cringe worthy, isn’t it.

    Like

  7. MAL says:

    You’re correct, Bay. The border works BOTH ways, doesn’t it? I guess we can always go to Mexico and become an American gardener!

    Liked by 1 person

  8. MAL says:

    I have previously compared Trump in a way with Gen. Patton. Both said or did things that got them in trouble. However, both men also did an outstanding. job. They were also respected and feared by their adversaries.

    Like

Leave a comment